Unraveling Our Beginnings: On the Embryonic Science of Fetal Psychology
Excerpts from the article in The Psychologist 18 (8), 474-477, Aug 2005, published by the British Psychological Society. Professor Peter Hepper is in the School of Psychology at Queen’s University Belfast and directs the Fetal Behavior Research Centre in Belfast, Ireland.
The history of man for the nine months preceding his birth would, probably, be far more interesting and contain events of greater moment than for all the three score and ten years that follow it. (Samuel Taylor Coleridge)
For 38 weeks of our lives, we live underwater, in relative darkness, warm, maybe even cozy. We develop faster than at any other time. We experience noise and smells… frequently experienced stimuli become familiar, perhaps reassuring. We exercise regularly. Matters of great importance for our future lives are taking place, yet we have no memory of this time. Further, as if to deny any relevance of this period, it is only when it ends that our official age begins.
However, these 38 weeks before birth were not irrelevant and the study of fetal psychology is unravelling the significance of the prenatal period and behavior for our development. In this article, I examine the behavior of the fetus, its importance for development, and how a greater understanding of fetal behavior may be used to improve the health of the fetus.
The Behavior of the Fetus
Ultrasound technology has provided a window through which the behavior of the fetus may be observed. Although pregnant women report feeling their baby move at around 16–20 weeks of gestation, ultrasound observations have revealed that the fetus begins to move at 7–8 weeks (de Vries et al., 1985). These first movements appear slow and originate in the spinal cord: the back may flex or extend, and this results in passive movements of the arms and legs. The types of movement exhibited by the fetus expand rapidly and by 14–15 weeks virtually all the movements the fetus will exhibit have emerged (see box).
As the fetus develops, its movements become organised into periods of activity and inactivity. This culminates at the end of pregnancy with the emergence of four behavioral states – quiet sleep, active sleep, quiet awake, active awake – precursors of the behavioral states seen in newborns (Nijhuis et al., 1982)
The examination of fetal movements has produced some fascinating discoveries. For example, handedness is observed from 10 weeks of gestation (Hepper et al., 1998). Intriguingly, there have been no reports of hemispheric differences at this age, which may suggest that it is differential left- and right-sided movements that lead to lateralisation of brain function rather than the other way round. Rapid eye movements, associated with dreaming in adults, have been observed in the last third of pregnancy (Horimoto et al., 1993).
Early views of the fetus portrayed its environment as one of sensory deprivation. Research has revised this view (Hepper, 1992) and demonstrated that the fetus has considerable sensory abilities. The only sense unlikely to be stimulated naturally in the womb is that of vision, as the mother’s clothes and tissue will block out light.
The first sense to develop is that of touch (Hooker, 1952). By eight weeks of gestation the fetus responds to touch around the lips and cheeks. By 14 weeks most of its body, excluding the back and top of the head, responds to touch. The fetus touches its face from 10–11 weeks and contact with the umbilical cord and uterine wall, and possibly other womb mates, provides tactile stimulation.
Flavors from the mother’s diet pass into the amniotic fluid, so when the fetus begins to swallow this fluid, around the 12th week of gestation, it may experience the flavours of its mother’s diet (Mennella et al., 1995). By 15–16 weeks the fetus responds to the flavor of the amniotic fluid (Liley, 1972) swallowing more if the fluid tastes sweet but less if it tastes ‘bitter’.
The fetus responds to sound from 22–24 weeks (Hepper & Shahidullah, 1994). Initially, responses are found only in the low-frequency range (250–500Hz) of adult hearing (20–20000Hz), but this range expands as the fetus matures. In late pregnancy, the fetus can discriminate between different voices (Lecanuet et al., 1993) and speech sounds – ‘BIBA’ and ‘BABI’ (Shahidullah & Hepper, 1994).
The uterine environment of the fetus is quite noisy (Querleu et al., 1988). The mother’s heartbeat, blood flow and digestive system all contribute to the fetus’s auditory world. Sounds from the external world can be heard, although with some attenuation by the mother’s tissues. Interestingly, there is little attenuation around 125–250Hz, the fundamental frequency of the human voice. Thus, the mother talking and other speech sounds in the environment will be readily heard and will form a major part of the fetus’s environment (Querleu et al., 1988).
One sensory ability that has aroused considerable interest is that of pain sensation (Glover & Fisk, 1999). The determination of whether the fetus feels pain is made more difficult by the fact that pain is a subjective phenomenon. Pain responses have been observed in the premature infant from around 24–26 weeks, a time when the neural pathways for pain are first formed (Fitzgerald, 1993). Biochemical stress responses to needle punctures during blood transfusions are found from 23 weeks (Giannakoulopoulos et al., 1994). These, however, are all indirect measures of pain, and debate is rife as to whether the fetus feels pain. Although lacking a definitive answer, this does not prevent consideration of the use of analgesia for the fetus and it may be appropriate to err on the side of caution and administer analgesia irrespective of whether the fetus feels pain or not (Glover & Fisk, 1996). However, the analgesia itself may have adverse consequences; more research is needed to resolve this issue.
Whether the fetus can learn has attracted considerable interest, possibly because learning is often seen as the pinnacle of adult achievement. Early studies of learning in the 1930s and 1940s, perhaps reflecting the zeitgeist, demonstrated classical conditioning in late pregnancy (Ray, 1932). Peiper (1925) reported a decrement in fetal response to a repeated sound (car horn), and more recently the fetus has been demonstrated to habituate to auditory stimuli from around 22–24 weeks (Hepper & Leader, 1996).
Newborns prefer their mother’s voice to that of an unfamiliar female (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980), a preference that is acquired prenatally. Newborns prefer music they have heard prenatally to that which they have never heard (Hepper, 1991). Interestingly, this preference can be observed at 36 weeks but not 30 weeks, which may indicate that learning of familiar sounds or tunes occurs after 30 weeks.
The fetus also learns about tastes and smells. For example, if the mother eats garlic during her pregnancy her newborn exhibits less of an aversion to garlic than newborns whose mothers did not eat garlic (Schaal et al., 2000). Newborns show a preference for the odour of their mother over that of another female (Macfarlane, 1975) and orient to their own amniotic fluid, both observations suggestive of prenatal learning of odours and tastes.
Whether long-term preferences can result from prenatal learning is unknown. Newborn preferences for music acquired prenatally disappear by three weeks of age in the absence of any postnatal exposure (Hepper, 1991).
The Importance of Fetal Behavior
The fetus is continually active in and reactive to its environment. But why does the fetus move, sense its environment, learn? It is possible that the behavior and experiences of the fetus have no impact on its development and are mere byproducts of the maturation process. However, research suggests the behaviour of the fetus is important for its development both before and after birth (Hepper, 1996), ensuring its survival and beginning its integration into the social world.
Adapting to the womb - The fetal environment is very different from that experienced after birth. In order to survive in this environment the fetus may exhibit behaviors suited to this environment – ontogenetic adaptations (Oppenheim, 1984). To date, there has been little research examining this aspect of the fetus’s behaviour. It may be that some of the reflexes exhibited by the newborn are required by the fetus to aid its movement during birth.
Practice makes perfect - One key role for prenatal activity is to practise behaviours that are essential for survival after birth; for example, fetal breathing movements. These begin at 9–10 weeks and occur around 30 per cent of the time at 30 weeks (Patrick et al., 1980). Although there is no air in the womb these breathing movements help the neural pathways responsible for breathing to mature, ensuring a fully operational system when required at the moment of birth.
Forming joints and muscles - The movements of the fetus are essential for the formation of the joints and muscle tone (Drachman & Sokoloff, 1966). Initially, the joints develop with rough surfaces; but as the fetus moves, the joints are reshaped and develop their smooth surfaces to enable complete mobility. Absence of movement in joints has been linked to malformation, (e.g. club foot).
Getting ready for the breast - Prenatal olfactory learning may facilitate the establishment of breast-feeding. Although alternatives exist to breastfeeding today, in the evolution of the mother/fetus/newborn biological system alternatives to breast-feeding were not available. If the individual was to survive its only source of nourishment in the immediate postnatal period was breast milk. The same processes that flavor the mother’s breast milk also flavour the amniotic fluid, so the fetus may learn about the flavor of breast milk from swallowing amniotic fluid. Mothers whose diet changes across the birth period have much more difficulty in establishing breast-feeding than mothers whose diet remains the same.
Attachment - The ability of the fetus to recognize its mother’s voice and smell may be important for the processes of attachment and exploration. While the newborn has a rudimentary sensory system able to process auditory and chemosensory information, and to a lesser extent visual information, it knows nothing about its environment. Imagine yourself with sensory systems able to process information but in which nothing is familiar – disorientation indeed. It would make good sense for the newborn to be able to recognise one familiar object in this sensory milieu, and even better sense if this object is its mother and primary caregiver. Recognition by sound and smell are also advantageous as they operate remotely; that is, the mother may be out of visual contact with her baby but the baby can hear and smell her over some distance, providing a familiar recognizable cue in the newborn’s environment.
Language - Experience with speech sounds in the womb may begin the process of language acquisition (Moon & Fifer, 2000). Newborns recognize and prefer their mother’s language, and are able to discriminate this from an unfamiliar language (Moon et al., 1993). Recordings from the womb reveal that speech sounds clearly emerge from the background noise (Querleu et al., 1988). This exposure may be the beginning of language acquisition.
Boosting brain cells - At a more general level, experience during the prenatal period may be important, or even essential, for normal development, especially of the brain. It is well established that the nervous system develops in response to the experiences it receives and from activity generated within the system (Lagercrantz & Ringstedt, 2001). The prenatal period marks the most rapid period of development of our brain. At its peak some 250,000 brain cells are being produced every minute. The normal prenatal environment (of changing sensory information, fetal activity and reactivity) may provide necessary and essential stimulation for the formation of the CNS and subsequently its function.
The Abortion Debate
With evidence accumulating of the fetus’s behavior and its importance for development, these findings have been used in social, moral and political debates surrounding reproductive issues – especially abortion. However, their bearing on this discussion has been questioned. The debate over abortion often revolves around the beginning of life, variously argued to occur at conception, through the point of ‘sustainable’ life outside the womb (around 22–26 weeks), to the moment of birth. The fetus’s behavior may not be conclusive to this determination.
Many factors contribute to an individual’s views on abortion and the behaviour of the fetus may be one factor in this. It is not my intention to enter into the debate here, but rather to raise two issues of relevance to the use of behaviour in this debate. First, the onset of abilities during the prenatal period is not an all-or-none process, but rather a gradual process of development, expansion and refinement following initial appearance. Thus, attempts to determine the start point for a particular behavior face similar and familiar problems to those when attempting to determine the start of life.
Second, care needs to be taken in the interpretation of human fetal behavior. Although the human fetus can learn, identical learning abilities have been found in other mammalian fetuses, bird embryos, reptile embryos, amphibian embryos and even insect pupae (see Sneddon et al., 1998, and references therein). Whilst research on the behavior of the fetus may contribute to the abortion debate and help inform individual views, it does not hold the magic key to resolve the debate.
Improving Fetal Well-Being
As more knowledge is gained about the behaviour of the fetus and the factors that influence development, opportunities are presented to use this to enhance the health of the fetus.
Despite a number of techniques to assess fetal well-being (e.g. analysis of genetic/chromosomal constitution, structure, and autonomic function), none directly assess the functioning of the brain. Since the behaviour of the fetus directly represents the functioning of its nervous system, observation of the fetus’s behaviour provides an excellent means of assessing neural function and dysfunction (Hepper, 1995).
Aberrant patterns of behavior have been observed in fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities, neural tube defects, maternal illness (e.g. diabetes) and those exposed to illegal and social drugs (e.g. Hepper et al., 2005; Nijhuis, 1992). Moreover, analysis of behaviour enables the severity of effect to be determined (Hepper, 1995). Examining the behavior of the fetus has advantages when assessing the effects of drugs or potential teratogens. As behaviour reflects the output of the brain, it can provide an assessment of function independent of information on input, which may be difficult to obtain (e.g. how much alcohol was consumed). Assessing behaviour examines the actual effect exposure to alcohol, or other substances, has had on brain function. Although only at the very early stages of development, analysis of the fetus’s behaviour may provide important information on fetal health, leading to improved diagnosis and better treatments.
The action of drugs (e.g. thalidomide) on the fetus demonstrates that prenatal influences exert a long-term effect. Recently the role of experiences in influencing the development and function of physiological systems has been recognised, suggesting certain adult diseases have fetal origins – the fetal origins of adult disease hypothesis (Barker, 1992). Evidence is now accumulating that maternal psychological factors may influence the fetal environment exerting a long-term influence on the developing fetus. This research poses significant challenges for our treatment of the prenatal period.
Recent evidence has suggested an important link between maternal anxiety during pregnancy and outcome after birth (O’Connor et al., 2003). High prenatal maternal anxiety levels have been linked with lower mental and motor development at eight months of age, lower mental development at two years and higher levels of behavioural and emotional problems at six years nine months. It is argued that maternal anxiety influences the functioning of the maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which in turn influences fetal brain development, resulting in the subsequent poorer psychological and behavioral performance. This poses major challenges for the public health agenda.
Considerable resources have been employed in attempts to reduce the consumption of alcohol and smoking by pregnant women. What could or should be done to reduce maternal anxiety if this effect on brain development and performance is further confirmed? There is no easy answer, and it is obvious that the scale of any such intervention would be huge and complicated. But this should not mean that the opportunity to enhance development should be ignored.
The first 38 weeks of our development has been shrouded in mystery, but now the embryonic science of fetal psychology is revealing the importance of this period for the rest of our lives. As well as advancing our knowledge of the ontogenetic processes before birth, the greater understanding of prenatal development presents an opportunity to promote the health and well-being of the fetus and provide individuals with the best start in life possible.
|Behavior||Gestational age (weeks)|
|Just discernible movement||7|
|Fetal breathing movements||10|
|Sucking and swallowing||12|
Barker, D.J.P. (Ed.) (1992). Fetal and infant origins of adult disease. London: BMJ.
DeCasper, A.J. & Fifer, W.P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.
de Vries, J.P.P., Visser, G.H.A. & Prechtl, H.F.R. (1985). The emergence of fetal behaviour. II. Quantitative aspects. Early Human Development, 12, 99–120.
Drachman, D.B. & Sokoloff, L. (1966). The role of movement in embryonic joint development. Developmental Biology, 14, 401–420.
Fitzgerald, M. (1993). Development of pain pathways and mechanisms. In K.J.S. Anand & P.J. McGrath (Eds.) Pain research and clinical management (pp.19–38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Giannakoulopoulos, X., Sepulveda, W., Kourtis, P., Glover, V. & Fisk, N.M. (1994). Fetal plasma cortisol and ß-endorphin response to intrauterine needling. The Lancet, 344, 77–81.
Glover, V. & Fisk, N.M. (1996). We don’t know; better to err on the safe side from mid-gestation. British Medical Journal, 313, 796.
Glover, V. & Fisk, N.M. (1999.) Fetal pain: Implications for research and practice. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106, 881–889.
Hepper, P.G. (1991). An examination of fetal learning before and after birth. Irish Journal of Psychology, 12, 95–107.
Hepper, P.G. (1992). Fetal psychology. An embryonic science. In J.G. Nijhuis (Ed.) Fetal behaviour: Developmental and perinatal aspects, (pp.129–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hepper, P.G. (1995). The behaviour of the foetus as an indicator of neural functioning. In J-P. Lecanuet, W. Fifer, N. Krasnegor & W. Smotherman (Eds.) Fetal development. A psychobiological perspective (pp.405–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hepper, P.G. (1996). Fetal memory: Does it exist? What does it do? Acta Paediatrica Suppl., 416, 16–20.
Hepper, P.G., Dornan, J.C. & Little, J.F. (2005). Maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy may delay the development of spontaneous fetal startle behaviour. Physiology and Behavior, 83, 711–714.
Hepper, P.G. & Leader, L.R. (1996). Fetal habituation. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 8, 109–123.
Hepper, P.G., McCartney, G.R. & Shannon, E.A. (1998). Lateralised behaviour in first trimester human foetuses. Neuropsychologia, 36, 531–534.
Hepper, P.G. & Shahidullah, S. (1994). The development of fetal hearing. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 6, 167–179.
Hooker, D. (1952) The prenatal origin of behavior. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Horimoto, N., Hepper, P.G., Shahidullah, S. & Koyanagi, T. (1993). Fetal eye movements. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3, 362–369.
Lagercrantz, H. & Ringstedt, T. (2001). Epigenetic and functional organization of the neuronal circuits in the CNS during development. In M.I.Levene, F.A. Chervenak & Whittle, M.J. (Eds.) Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery (3rd edn, pp.3–9). London: Churchill Livingstone.
Lecanuet, J-P., Granier-Deferre. C, Jacquet, A.Y., Capponi, I. & Ledru, L. (1993). Prenatal discrimination of male and female voice uttering the same sentence. Early Development and Parenting, 2, 217–228.
Liley, A.W. (1972) The foetus as a personality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 99–105.
Macfarlane, A.J. (1975). Olfaction in the development of social preferences in the human neonate. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 33, 103–117.
Mennella, J., Johnson, A. & Beauchamp, G. (1995). Garlic ingestion by pregnant women alters the odor of amniotic fluid. Chemical Senses, 20, 207–209.
Moon, C., Cooper, R.P. & Fifer, W.P. (1993). Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495–500.
Moon, C.M. & Fifer, W.P. (2000). The fetus: Evidence of transnatal auditory learning. Journal of Perinatology, 20, S37–S44.
Nijhuis, J.G. (Ed.) (1992). Fetal behaviour: Developmental and perinatal aspects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nijhuis, J.G., Prechtl, H.F.R., Martin, C.B. & Bots, R.S.G.M. (1982). Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Human Development, 6, 177–195.
O’Connor, T., Heron, J., Golding, J., Glover, V. & the ALSPAC team (2003). Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: A test of a programming hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1025–1036.
Oppenheim, R.W. (1984). Ontogenetic adaptations in neural development: Toward a more ‘ecological’ developmental psychobiology. In H.F.R. Prechtl (Ed.) Continuity of neural functions from prenatal to postnatal life (pp.16–30). London: Spastics International.
Peiper, A. (1925) Sinnesempfindungen des Kindes vor seiner Geburt. Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde, 29, 237–241.
Prechtl, H.F.R. (1988). Developmental neurology of the fetus. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2, 21–36.
Querleu, D., Renard, X., Versyp, F., Paris-Delrue, L. & Crepin, G. (1988). Fetal hearing. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 29, 191–212.
Ray, W.S. (1932). A preliminary report on a study of foetal conditioning. Child Development, 3, 175–177.
Schaal, B., Marlier, L. & Soussignan, R. (2000). Human foetuses learn odours from their pregnant mother’s diet. Chemical Senses, 25, 729–737.
Shahidullah, S. & Hepper, P.G. (1994). Frequency discrimination by the fetus. Early Human Development, 36, 13–26.
Sneddon, H, Hadden, R, & Hepper, P.G. (1998). Chemosensory learning in the chicken embryo. Physiology and Behavior, 64, 133–139.
Early development videos: health.discovery.com/convergence/ultpregnancy/video.html
Obstetric ultrasound: www.ob-ultrasound.net
The Visible Embryo: www.visembryo.com/baby/index.html