Warning message

This content is filtered. APPPAH membership is required for full access to journal articles.
-A +A
Issue: 
Publication Date: 
December, 2018
Page Count: 
17
Starting Page: 
93
Brief Summary: 

This article discusses a study that assessed Israeli women’s attitudes toward the "natural" cesarean technique via an online survey and maps obstetric departments with its practice.

Abstract: 

The “natural” cesarean is an elective cesarean technique, which attempts to mirror the normal physiology of the vaginal birth process and the immediate period after birth, conceptualized in the early 2000s and gaining popularity. Women who have no choice but to undergo an elective cesarean section, their babies, and spouses can all benefit from this procedure. Although previous studies examined women’s attitudes towards cesarean delivery, women’s attitudes towards the “natural” cesarean have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to assess Israeli women’s attitudes toward the technique via an online survey and map obstetric departments with its practice.

References: 

Al Khalaf, S.Y., O’Neill, S.M., O’Keeffe, L.M., Henriksen, T.B., Kenny, L.C., Cryan, J.F., & Khashan, A.S. (2015). The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior‏. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(10), 1557–1567.

Armbrust, R., Hinkson, L., von Weizsacker, K., & Henrich, W. (2016). The Charite cesarean birth: A family orientated approach of cesarean section. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 29(1), 163–168.

Betrán, A.P., Ye, J., Moller, A.B., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A.M., & Torloni, M.R. (2016). The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS One, 11(2), e0148343.

Briere, R. (Ed.). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Camann, W., & Trainor, K. (2012). Clear surgical drapes: A technique to facilitate the “natural cesarean delivery". Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115(4), 981–982.

Camann, W., & Barbieri, R. (2013). Mother-, baby-, and family-centered cesarean delivery: It is possible. ObGyn Management, 25(3), 12–15.

Corrigan, J., Swift, E., & Hurtado, M. (Eds.). (2001). Envisioning the national health care quality report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

DiMatteo, M., Morton, S., Lepper, H., & Damush, T. (1996). Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis., 15(4), 303–314.

Douché, J. (2009). Rhetorical (de) vices and the, construction of a ’natural’caesarean.‏ New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 40, 20-23.

Dowling, J. (2007, April 15). Delivered safely by caesarean with his mother’s hands. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/ articles/2007/04/14/1175971419538.html

Emek medical center. (n.d.). The ‘natural’ cesarean section. [Hebrew]. Retrieved from https://hospitals.clalit.co.il/emek/he/departmentsandclinics

/women_birth_department/moadon_yoldot_hila/Pages/natural_cesarean.aspx

Fawcett, J., Aber, C., Haussler, S., & Weiss, M. (2011). Women’s perceptions of caesarean birth: A Roy international study‏. Nursing Science, 24(4), 352–362.

Gregory, K.D., Jackson, S., Korst, L., & Fridman, M. (2012). Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: Whose risks? Whose benefits? American Journal of Perinatology, 29, 7-18.

IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk. [computer software]. NY: IBM Corp.

Israel Centeral Bureau of Statistics (2016). Annual statistics - Part 2: Population 2016. [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton67/np2.pdf

Kelmanson, I. (2013). Emotional and behavioural features of preschool children born by Caesarean deliveries at maternal request‏. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(6), 676–690.

Kosinski, M., Matz, S., Gosling, S., & Popov, V. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines.‏ American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556.

Lara, T. (2013). Cesarean inter-section.‏. Midwifery Today, 107, 34-35.

Litorp, H., Mgaya, A., Kidanto, H.L., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2015). “What about the mother?” Women׳s and caregivers׳ perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates. Midwifery, 31(7), 713–720.

Lobel, M., & DeLuca, R. S. (2007). Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications. Social Science & Medicine, 64(11), 2272–2284.

Magee, S.R., Battle, C., Morton, J., & Nothnagle, M. (2014). Promotion of Family-Centered Birth With Gentle Cesarean Delivery. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27(5), 690–693.

Manny, A. (2018). Obstetrics in Israel 2017 report. Annual Meeting of the Israeli Society of Mother and Fetal Medicine. [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://ismfm.mednet.co.il/מצגות

Meir medical center. (n.d.). Skin to skin cesarean section. [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.yoldotmeir.co.il/ניתוח-קיסרי-skin-to-skin/

Netz, N. (2014). The relationship between type of child delivery, sensory profile, and level of anxiety: A comparison between children aged 3 to 10 born by a cesarean section vs. vaginal birth (Unpublished masters thesis). [Hebrew]. Haifa University: Haifa.

Newman, L., & Hancock, H. (2009). How natural can major surgery really be? A critique of “the natural caesarean” technique. Birth, 36, 168-170.

Pevzner, L., Preslicka, C., & Bush, M. (2011). Women’s attitudes regarding mode of delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request‏. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 24(7), 894–899.

Posthuma, S., & Korteweg, F. (2017). Risks and benefits of the skin-to-skin cesarean section–a retrospective cohort study‏. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30(2), 159–163.

Rotem, Y. (2016). The friendly cesarean section. [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.keisarit.co.il/friendly_cesarean

Schorn, M.N., Moore, E., Spetalnick, B.M., & Morad, A. (2015). Implementing Family-Centered Cesarean Birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 60(6), 682–690.

Shapira, A.L. (2017). The Emotional Ramifications of Being Born in a Cesarean Delivery. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, 31(3), 7-18.

Simmonds, C. (2016). Review of practice: Facilitating normality at caesarean section‏. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 26, 166-169.

Sirvinskiene, G., Zemaitiene, N., Jusiene, R., & Markuniene, E. (2016). Predictors of emotional and  problems in one-year-old children: A longitudinal perspective. Infant Mental Health Journal, 37(4), 401–410.

Smith, J. (2012). The natural caesarean: A woman-centred technique. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 32(2), 204–204.

Smith, J., Plaat, F., & Fisk, N. (2008). The natural caesarean: A woman-centred technique. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 115(8), 1037–1042.

Tumblin, A. (2013). A family-centered cesarean birth story‏. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 22, 130-132.

Wiseman, H. (2012, November 20). The natural caesarean: A woman-centered technique. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=wdyzAuc3Ff8&t=23s

Xie, R., Gaudet, L., Krewski, D., Graham, I., & Walker, M. (2015). Higher cesarean delivery rates are associated with higher infant mortality rates in industrialized countries‏. Birth, 42(1), 62–69.