Warning messageThis content is filtered. APPPAH membership is required for full access to journal articles.
This study explored women’s trust-based and fear-based beliefs about birth. It asked: Do women trust their bodies’ innate intelligence to give birth, or does fear override trust? The study sought to understand whether beliefs, fears, and trust associate with birth experiences and birth outcomes.
This study explored women’s trust-based and fear-based beliefs about birth. It asked: Do women trust their bodies’ innate intelligence to give birth, or does fear override trust? The study sought to understand whether beliefs, fears, and trust associate with birth experiences and birth outcomes. Data were collected by way of a qualitative, cross-sectional survey distributed to Georgian Court University faculty, staff, students, and alumni, as well as to women undergoing HypnoBirthing, home birthing, and water birthing. The study posed 43 questions—each inquiring about beliefs and fears associated with birth—and then mapped them to birth experience and outcome. The results of this study indicate that fear states are associated with higher incidences of interventions and C-sections. In addition, the results show that no fear and low fear values are associated with self-reported calm states and more-positive birth experiences. Therefore, this study concluded that the ability to maintain a calm meditative state during labor may be effective in the improvement of birth experiences and birth outcomes because it supports the neurohormonal physiology of birth.
Arms, S. (1994). Immaculate Deception II: A fresh look at childbirth. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.
Bak, C. (2004). Cultural lack of birth experience empowers media, not women. Midwifery Today with International Midwife, Winter Issue (72), 44-45. Retrieved from http://www.midwiferytoday.com/
Begley, C. (2014). Intervention or interference? The need for expectant care throughout normal labour. Sexual & Reproductive Health, 5(4), 160-164
Bennett, A., Hetherington, W., & Hewson, D. (1993). Childbirth choices. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin Books.
Buckley, S. (2004). Undisturbed birth - nature’s hormonal blueprint for safety, ease and ecstasy. MIDIRS Midwifery, Digest 14, 203-209.
Buckley, S. J. (2015). Executive summary of hormonal physiology of childbearing: Evidence and implications for women, babies and maternity care. Journal of Perinatal Education, 24(3), 145-153. http://dx.doi.org/http:/dx.doi.org/ 20.1891/1058-1243.24.3.145
Davis, J. P. (2010). Midwives and normalcy in childbirth: A phenomenologic concept development study. Journal Midwifery Woman’s Health, 55, 206-215.
Dick-Read, G. (1944/1985). Childbirth without fear. New York: Perennial Library.
Goer, H. (1995). Obstetric myths versus research realities: A guide to the medical literature. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Haines, H.M., Rubertsson, C., Pallant, J.F., & Hildingsson, I. (2011). Womens’ attitudes and beliefsw of childbirth and association with birth preference: A comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancy. Midwifery, 10, 1016.
Milan, M. (2003). Childbirth as healing: three woman’s experiences of independent midwife care. Berkshire UK: Churchill Livingstone.
Naaktgeboren, C. (1989). The biology of childbirth, in Effective Care in Pregnancy and childbirth, Chalmers, I., & Enkin, M., Eds., Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Russell, C., & Schofield, T. (1986). Where it hurts: an introduction to sociology for health workers. Sydney: Allen and Unwyn.
Stenglin, M., & Foureur, M. (2013). Designing out the Fear Cascade to increase the likelihood of normal birth. Midwifery, 29, 819-825.
VandeVusse, L., Ireland, J., Berner, M., Fuller, S., & Adams, D. (2007). Hypnosis for childbirth: A retrospective comparative analysis of outcomes in ones obstetricians practice. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 50, 109-119.
White, T., Matthey, S., Boyd, K., & Barnett, B. (2006). Postnatal depression and post-traumatic stress after childbirth: Prevalence, course and co-occurrence. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 24(2), 107-120.