Warning messageThis content is filtered. APPPAH membership is required for full access to journal articles.
The cosmologies of many cultures use gender as symbolic for polar attributes of human consciousness. The author presents a developmental neurobiological theory to account for the non-arbitrary way in which this attribution comes about, and applies the theory to an explanation of the symbolic use of gender in Tibetan tantric Buddhism. He concludes by discussing the implications of the theory for understanding the effects of positive and negative pre- and perinatal experiences upon the development of gender identity.
1. This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex in Chicago, November, 1983. We owe much to the ideas and suggestions, as well as editorial corrections, offered by John McManus, Peter Hertz, Shawn MacPherson, Steve Richer, Myra Mossman, Shelley Chubby, Karen Friedl, John Cove, Sheila Richardson, Iain Prattis, Elizabeth Allgeier, Radhika Sekar and Sheila Evans. A special acknowledgement must go to Michael Ling who did much of the library research for us and contributed to many discussions. However, none of these folks should be held responsible for our peculiar views.
2. The perspective taken here is that of biogenetic structuralism (Laughlin and d'Aquili 1974; d'Aquili et al 1979). Biogenetic structuralism is an interdisciplinary approach that is grounded in evolutionary biology and the neurosciences, and that has tried wherever possible to integrate data derived from direct experience into models of neurocognitve process (see Laughlin, McManus and Shearer 1984). Our group is interested in how symbolism operates in the neurocognitive mediation of religious experience (Laughlin et al 1979, 1981; Laughlin and Stephens 1980; d'Aquili 1982, Webber et al 1983. The perspective most closely allied to our own are those of Pribram (1971,1977), Globus (1976), Piaget (1971,1977,1980), Crook (1980), and Count (1973).
3. In attempting always to integrate neurocognitive with cross-cultural behavioral and phenomenological data toward a solution to any particular problem, we have become sensitized to expect some form of direct, firsthand experience underlying even seemingly bizarre tales, myths, legends, ceremonials, mystical dramas and "superstitions." We feel that the human sciences must now come to credence the possibility that direct experiences are the source of cross-cultural symbolic material, as was suggested by Thompson (1935:201-202) for claims of psychic powers for saints in the middle ages, and as has been shown by Hufford (1982) for the so-called Old Hag phenomenon and by Greeley (1975) for a variety of psychic occurrences including deja vu, clairvoyance and contact with the dead.
4. Among the polemics encountered during this study were: free choice vs. right to life; Freud vs. Rank (is birth recall memory or mere fantasy?); the primacy of perception vs. the primacy of cognition in experience; clinical data vs. pure research (the usual applied vs. pure science squabble); "split-brain" vs. "working brain" models of neural asymmetry; nature vs. nurture (or nature vs. culture); gender as symbol vs. gender as role; mind and brain different vs. mind-brain identity. In order to bear in on the essence of the central thesis, we will sidestep most of these weighty issues where they do not directly bear on the thesis. However, to avoid possible misunderstanding, the views forming a background to our theory may be presumed from the following caveats:
a) Consciousness begins at or near conception. This is contrary to the dominant belief in North American culture that life and consciousness begin respectively at and after birth. The evidence in favor of pre- and peri-natal consciousness seems to be overwhelming and growing rapidly (see reviews by Verny 1982; deMause 1981; Chamberlain 1983; Stone et al 1973; Kessen et al 1970). The interesting questions center on the nature of consciousness and its constituent functions at the various stages of pre- and peri-natal development.
b) Consciousness does not equal response. The presence of behavior is not requisite for the presence of consciousness, or any of the other constituents of consciousness; i.e. attention, sensation, feeling, cognition, memory, etc. Requiring response as evidence of consciousness is a long-standing error in the human sciences, influencing even sophisticated researchers such as Piaget (see Gruber and Voneche 1977:Part V). It has reached the point in research with prenatal children and with animals where it is reasonable to presume consciousness until proven otherwise, rather than presume lack of consciousness.
c) Birth recall may be, and often is, veridical memory and not merely fantasy. A number of researchers have verified birth memory reports using a variety of methods (see Raikov 1980, 1982; Cheek 1974; Chamberlain 1980, 1982, see Chamberlain 1983 for review).
d) Interdisciplinary study is the key to understanding complex issues. In keeping with the views of Sherif (1977) on the social sciences, and more recently of Kirk (1983) on the study of neurocognitive processes, the trend in science is away from highly specialized treatments of complex subjects, and toward interdisciplinary collaboration. This pooling of information and insight must incorporate both the socalled pure and applied (clinical) approaches.
e) Nature vs. nurture is a false dichotomy. There is in reality no separation of nature and culture. As we will come to see, the conceptual opposition of these two aspects in the thinking of people is due largely to psychodynamic factors and not an accurate scientific description of experience.
f) "Mind" and "brain" are two ways of viewing the same process. "Brain" refers to the physiological-structural attributes of "mind," and "mind" refers to the ways "brain" experiences its own functions. To posit mind-brain dualism is yet one more false dichotomy. Mind you, this is not a simplistic reductionist or identity view in which brain may be treated as mind, or mind as brain. Rather it is a structural monist view in which mind and brain are treated as different windows for watching the same process-and the more windows the better.
5. Anthropologists recognize that cross-culturally the male parental figure is not always the male genitor, but may be mother's brother or some other category of kin. But for simplicity we will refer to "father" throughout this study.
6. We are refraining from offering any simplistic definition of consciousness. To define the term would imply we understand precisely what consciousness is. Rather, the question of consciousness is problematic: what consciousness is, how it functions, its relationship to physiology, how it develops, are all questions of primary concern.
7. The term "sensorium" is a common one in medicine and psychiatry meaning "any sensory nerve center; more frequently the whole sensory apparatus of the body" (Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 23rd edition).
8. Towards the end of his career, Merleau-Ponty had concluded that even the organization of perception could be influenced by culture (Merleau-Ponty 1968:212; see also Bide 1983:109ff), thus bringing his thinking in line with a major theme in anthropological theory, the so-called Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (see Miller and McNeil 1969 for a review).
9. To put it in Greek terms, the organization of physis is both epistemologically and ontologically prior to that of logos.
10. Our use of prajna and vinnana agrees more with Suzuki (1967:66) than with Turner (1974:47ff) in that prajna reflects the order-as-given in the perceived lifeworld and not the fundamentals of social organization, although the latter may be presented to consciousness in the former.
11. We are ignoring for the sake of simplicity any process of individuation leading to a more androgynous personality.
12. Tom Verny (personal communication) has also considered the connection between birth trauma and sexual violence on the part of males. He has initiated research along these lines.
d'Aquili, E.G. (1982) Senses of Reality in Science and Religion: A Neuroepistemological Perspective. Zygon 17(4):361-384.
d'Aquili, E.G., Laughlin, CD., McManus, J. (1979) The Spectrum of Ritual. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barlow, H.B., Mollon, J.D., editors (1982) The Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Beauvoir, S. (1982). The Second Sex. London, Penguin.
Beyer, S. (1973) The Cult of Tara. Berkeley, California, University of California Press.
Blakemore, C. (1974) Developmental Factors in the Formation of Feature Extracting Neurons. In The Neurosciences Third Study Program (ed. by F.O. Schmitt and F.G. Worden). Cambridge, MIT Press.
Bohm, D. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Borges, J.L. (1961) Antologia Personal Buenos Aires, Sur.
Brazelton, T.B., Als, H. (1979) Four Early Stages in the Development of Mother-Infant Interaction. The Psychosomatic Study of the Child 34:349-369.
Brazelton, T.B., Koslowski, B., Tronick, E. (1977) Neonatal Behavior Among Urban Zambians and Americans. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development (ed. by S. Chess and A. Thomas). New York, Brunner/Mazel Publishers.
Buddhaghosa, B. (1976) The Path of Purification (Visuddhimagga). Vol. 1. Berkeley, Shambbala.
Campbell, J. (1949) The Hero With a Thousand Faces. New York, The World Publishing Co.
Chamberlain, D.B. (1980) Reliability of Birth Memories: Evidence From Mother and Child Pairs in Hypnosis. Paper presented at 23rd annual meeting of American Society of Clinical Hypnosis, Minneapolis.
Chamberlain, D.B. (1982) Symposium Commentary on Lloyd de Mause's Fetal Origins of History. Journal of Psychohistory 10(2):222-229.
Chamberlain, D.B. (1983) Consciousness at Birth. Chamberlain Communication, 5164 35th Street, San Diego, California 92116.
Cheek, D.B. (1974) Sequential Head and Shoulder Movements Appearing With Age Regression In Hypnosis To Birth. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 16(4):261-266.
Count, E.W. (1973) Being and Becoming Human, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Crook, J.H. (1980) The Evolution of Human Consciousness. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
David-Neel, A. (1958) Magic and Mystery in Tibet. New York, University Books.
De Mause, L. (1981). The Fetal Origins of History. The Journal of Psychohistory 9(1):1-89.
Dowman, K. (1975). The Nyingma Icons: A Collection of Line Drawings, Kailash (Kathmandu, Nepal) 3(4):320-416.
Eliade, M. (1958) Birth and Rebirth, New York.
Eliade, M. (1964) Shamanism, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Evans-Wintz, W.Y. (1960) The Tibetan Book of the Dead New York, Galaxy.
Evans-Wintz, W.Y. (1969) Tibet's Great Yogi Milarepa. London, Oxford University Press.
Fries, M.E. (1977). Longitudinal Study: Prenatal Period to Parenthood, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 25:115-140.
Gellhorn, E. (1967). Principles of Autonomic-Somatic Integration. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Getly, A. (1962) The Gods of Northern Buddhism Rutland, Vt., Charles Tuttle.
Gibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Globus, G. et al. (1976) Consciousness and the Brain. New York, Plenum.
Greenley, A.M. (1975). The Sociology of the Paranormal Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
Groff, S. (1979) LSD Psychotherapy. Pomona, California, Hunter House.
Gruber, H.E., Voneche, J.J. (1977). The Essential Piaget New York, Basic Books.
Harner, M. (1980) The Way of the Shaman. New York, Bantam Books.
Haug, H. (1972) Stereological Methods in the Analysis of Neuronal Parameters in the Central Nervous System. Journal of Microscopy 95(1):165-180.
Hertz, R. (1909) Death and the Right Hand (the 1960 edition). Aberdeen, Cohen and West.
Hofer, M.A. (1974) The Role of Early Experience in the Development of Autonomic Regulation. In Limbic and Autonomic Nervous Systems Research (ed. by L.V. diCara). New York, Plenum.
Hufford, D.J. (1982). The Terror That Comes in the Night. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ihde, D. (1983) Existential Technics. Albany, New York, State University of New York Press.
James, W. (1962) The Principles of Psychology. New York, Dover.
Janov, A. (1972) The Primal Revolution, New York, Simon and Schuster.
Jung, C.G. (1955) Mysterum Coniunctionis. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kessen, W., Heath, M.M., Salapatek, P. (1970) Human Infancy: A Bibliography and Guide. In Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology (ed. by P. Mussen). New York, Wiley.
Kirk, V. (1983) Neuropsychology of Language, Reading, and Spelling. New York, Academic Press.
Klopf, A.H. (1982) The Hedonistic Neuron: A Theory of Memory, Learning and Intelligence New York: Hemisphere Publishing Co.
Laing, R.D. (1982) The Voice of Experience. London, Allen Lane.
Langworthy, V.R. (1933) Development of Behavior Patterns and Myelinization of the Nervous System in the Human Fetus and Infant. Contributions to Embryology. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institute. Vol. 24. No. 139.
Laughlin C.D., d'Aquili, E.G. (1974) Biogenetic Structuralism. New York, Columbia University Press.
Laughlin C.D., McManus, J., Shearer, J. (1984) Dreams, Trance and Visions: What a Transpersonal Anthropology Might Look Like. Phoenix 7:141-159.
Laughlin, C.D., McManus, J., Stephens, CD. (1981) "A Model of Brain and Symbol," Semiotica 33(3/4):211-236.
Laughlin, C.D., McManus, J., Webber, M. (1984) Neurognosis, Indviduation and Tibetan Arising Yoga Practice. Phoenix: Journal of Transpersonal Anthropology (in press).
Laughlin, C.D., Stephens, C.D. (1980) Symbolism, Canalization, and P-Structure, in Symbol As Sense (ed. by M.L. Foster and S. Brandis). New York, Academic Press.
Laughlin, C.D., McManus, J., Rubinstein, R.A., Shearer, J. (1985) The Ritual Control of Experience. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 7(in press).
Levi-Strauss, C. (1968) The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, Beacon.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1978) Myth and Meaning. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Liedloff, J. (1975) The Continuum Concept. London, Future Publications.
Liley, A.W., (1972). The Fetus As a Personality. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 6:99-105.
MacCormack, C. P., Strathern, M. (1980) Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968) The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.
Miller, G.A., McNeill, D. (1969) Psycholinguistics, in The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 3 (ed. by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson). Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
Narada Maha Thera (1975) A Manual of Abhidharma, Kandy, Sri Lanka, Buddhist Publication Society.
Needham R. (1973) Right and Left: Essays on Dual Symbolic Classification. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Neumann, E. (1963) The Great Mother. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Nishitani, K. (1982) Religion and Nothingness. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Ortner, S.B. (1974) Is Female To Male as Nature Is To Culture? In Woman, Culture and Society (ed. by M.Z. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere). Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Paul, R.A. (1982) The Tibetan Symbolic World Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Piaget, J. (1971) Biology and Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Piaget, J. (1977) The Development of Thought New York, The Viking Press.
Piaget, J. (1980) Adaptation and Intelligence Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Ploye, P.M. (1973) Does Prenatal Mental Life Exist? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 54:241-246.
Powers, W.T. (1973) Behavior: Control of Perception. Chicago, Aldine.
Pribram, K.H. (1971) Languages of the Brain. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Pribram, K.H. (1977) Observations on the Organization of Studies of Mind, Brain, and Behavior. In Alternate States of Consciousness (ed. by N. Zinbert). New York, The Free Press.
Raikov, V.L. (1980). Age Regression To Infancy By Adult Subjects In Deep Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 22(3):156-163.
Raikov, V.L. (1982) Hypnotic Age Regression to the Neonatal Period: Comparisons With Role Playing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 30(2):108-116.
Richmond, J.B., Lustman, S.L. (1955) Autonomic Function in the Neonate: I. Implications for Psychosomatic Theory. Psychosomatic Medicine 17:269ff.
Rubinstein, R.A. (1983). Structuralism and The Study of Cognitive Process. In The Future of Structuralism (ed. by J. Costen and A. deRuijter). Gottingen-Geismar, West Germany, Edition Herodot.
Rubinstein, R.A., Laughlin, CD. (1977) Bridging Levels of Systemic Organization. Current Anthropology 18:459-481.
Schell, L.M. (1981) Environmental Noise and Human Prenatal Growth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 56:63-70.
Selye, H. (1956) The Stress of Life. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Sherif, M. (1977) Crisis in Social Psychology: Some Remarks Towards Breaking Through the Crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 3:368-382.
Silber, H. (1971) Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts. New York, Dover (orig. ed. 1917).
Snellgrove, D., Richardson, H.E. (1968) A Cultural History of Tibet New York, Frederick Praeger.
Sontag, L.W. (1941) The Significance of Fetal Environmental Differences. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 42:996-1003.
Stave, U. (1978) Maturation, Adaptation, and Tolerance. In Perinatal Physiology (ed. by U. Stave). New York, Plenum Medical Book Co.
Stein, R.A. (1972) Tibetan Civilization, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Stone, L.J. et al (1973) The Competent Infant New York, Basic Books.
Sugarman, M. (1977) Perinatal Influences on Maternal-Infant Attachment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 48:407-421.
Suyuki, D.T. (1967) An Interpretation of Zen Experience. In The Japanese Mind (ed. by C.A. Moore). Honolulu, East-West Center Press.
Thompson, A.H. (1935) Bede: His Life, Times, and Writings. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Tillich, P. (1963) Systematic Theology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Trungpa, C. (1981) Journey Without Goal Boulder, Colorado, Prajna Press.
Turkewitz, G., Kenny, P.A. (1982) Limitations on Input as a Basis for Neural Organization and Perceptual Development: A Preliminary Theoretical Statement. Developmental Psychobiology 15(4):357-368.
Turner, V. (1974) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
Verny, T. (1982) the Secret Life of the Unborn Child New York, Dell.
Vycinas, V. (1961) Earth and Gods. The Hague, Nijhoff.
Webber, M., and Laughlin, CD. (1979) The Mechanism of Symbolic Penetration. Department of Sociology-Anthropology Working Paper 79-8, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Webber, M., Stephens, C.D., Laughlin, C.D. (1983) Masks: A Re-Examination, In The Power of Symbols (ed. by R. Crumrine and M. Halpin) Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press.
Wenger, M.A. (1941) The Measurement of Individual Differences in Autonomic Balance. Psychosomatic Medicine 3:427.
Willis, J.D. (1972) The Diamond Light New York, Simon and Schuster.
Charles D. Laughlin, Ph.D.
Dr. Charles Laughlin is a professor of anthropology in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6. He is co-author of the recently published book, Brain, Symbol and Experience (Boston: Shambhala New Science Library, 1990).