This study examines relationships between perceptions of control, postpartum depression, and physiological symptoms in women who gave birth vaginally or by cesarean. Extrapolating from a cognitive framework, it was hypothesized that women who gave birth by cesarean would exhibit lower levels of perceived control and higher levels of depression and physiological symptoms as compared with women who gave birth vaginally. Results were supportive of the hypotheses, suggesting that it may be helpful to explore ways of assisting women to experience greater control over their childbirth. Future research should assess the desire for and the value placed on perceptions of control in childbirth.
KEY WORDS: Childbirth, control, caesarean, postpartum depression.
Annandale, E (1987). Dimensions of patient control in a free-standing birth center. Social Science and Medicine, 25, 1235-1248.
Bandura, A (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Brewin, C & Bradley, C (1982). Perceived Control and the experience of childbirth. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 263-269.
Brown, J & Siegel, J (1988). Attributions for negative life events and depression: The role of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 316-322.
Burger, J (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246-256.
Campero, L, Garcia, C, Diaz, C, Ortiz, O, Reynoso, S, & Langer, A (1998). "Alone, I wouldn't have known what to do:" A qualitative study on social support during labor and delivery in Mexico. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 395-403.
Chan, D (1989). Dimensionality and adjustment correlates of locus of control among Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of Personality, 53, 145-160.
Connor, B (1977). Teaching about cesarean birth in traditional childbirth classes. Birth and the Family Journal, 4, 107-113.
Cook, T & Campbell, D (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
DiMatteo, M, Morton, S, Lepper, H, Damush, T, Carney, M, Pearson, M, & Kahn, K (1996). Cesarean childbirth and the psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 15, 303-314.
Edwards, D, Porter, S, & Stein, G (1994). A pilot study of postnatal depression following cesarean section using two retrospective self-rating instruments. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 111-117.
Erickson, M (1967). Method for frequent assessment of symptomology during pregnancy. Psychological Reports, 20, 447-450.
Glass, D & Singer, J (1972). Urban Stress: Experiments on Noise and Social Stressors. New York: Academic Press.
Gottlieb, S & Barrett, D (1986). Effects of unanticipated cesarean section on mothers, infants, and their interaction in the first month of life. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 180-185.
Greene, P, Zeichner, A, Roberts, N, Callahan, E, & Granados, J (1989). Preparation for cesarean delivery: A multicomponent analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 484-487.
Hillan, E (1992). Short-term morbidity associated with cesarean delivery. Birth, 19, 190-194.
Hodnett, E (1989). Personal control and the birth environment: Comparisons between home and hospital settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 207-216.
Hodnett, E & Simmons-Tropea, D (1987). The Labour Agentry Scale: Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Research in Nursing and Health, 10, 301-310.
Humenick, S (1981). Mastery: The key to childbirth satisfaction? A Review. Birth and the Family Journal, 8, 79-83.
Hwang, C (1987). Cesarean childbirth in Sweden: Effects on the mother and father-infant relationship. Infant Mental Health Journal, 8, 91-99.
Leathers, S, Kelley, M, & Richman, J (1997). Postpartum depressive symptomatology in new mothers and fathers: Parenting, work, and support. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185, 129-139.
Manning, M & Wright, T (1983). Self-efficacy expectancies, outcome expectancies, and the persistence of pain control in childbirth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 421-431.
Martin, J, Hamilton, B, Sutton, P, Ventura, S, Menacker, F, & Munson, M (2003). Births: Final Data for 2002. (National Vital Statistics Reports, 52 [21O]), Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Matthews, A & Ridgeway, V (1981). Personality and surgical recovery: A review. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 243, 260.
Mutryn, C (1993). Psychosocial impact of cesarean section on the family: A literature review. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 1271-1281.
Oakley, A (1983). Social consequences of obstetric technology: The importance of measuring "soft" outcomes. Birth, 10, 99-108.
Orbell, S, Johnston, M, Rowley, D, Espley, A, & Davey, P (1998). Cognitive representations of illness and functional and affective adjustment following surgery for osteoarthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 93-102.
Padawer, J, Pagan, C, Janoff-Bulman, R, Strickland, B, & Chorowski, M (1988). Women's psychological adjustment following emergency cesarean versus vaginal delivery. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 25-34.
Pederson, F, Zaslow, M, Cain, R, & Anderson, B (1981). Cesarean childbirth: Psychological implications for mothers and fathers. Infant Mental Health Journal, 2, 257-263.
Radloff, L (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Ridgeway, V & Matthews, A (1982). Psychological preparation for surgery: A comparison of methods. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 271-280.
Ryding, E, Wijma, K, & Wijma, B (1998). Psychological impact of emergency cesarean section in comparison with elective cesarean section, instrumental and normal vaginal delivery. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 19, 135-144.
Sastry, J & Ross, C (1998). Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 101-120.
Shearer, E (1989). Commentary: Does cesarean delivery affect the parents? Birth, 15, 57-58.
Scott-Palmer, J & Skevington, S (1981). Pain during childbirth and menstruation: A study of locus of control. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 25, 151-155.
Skinner, E (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549-570.
Taylor, S & Brown, J (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
Thompson, S, Sobolew-Shubin, A, Galbraith, M, Schwankovsky, L, & Cruzen, D (1993). Maintaining perceptions of control: Finding perceived control in low-control circumstances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 293-304.
Trowel, J (1982). Possible effects of emergency cesarean section on mother-child relationship. Early Human Development, 7, 41-51.
Tulman, L & Fawcett, J (1988). Return of functional ability after childbirth. Nursing Research, 37, 77-81.
Tulman, L & Fawcett, J (1991). Recovery from childbirth: Looking back six months after delivery. Health Care for Women International, 12, 341-350.
Wertz, R & Wertz, D (1989). Lying-in: A History of Childbirth in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wallston, K, Stein, M, & Smith, C (1994). Form C of the MHLC Scales: A conditionspecific measure of locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 534-553.
Wallston, B, Wallston, K, Kaplan, G, & Maides, S (1976). Development and validation of the Health Locus of Control (HLC) Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 580-585.
Wideman, M & Singer, J (1984). The role of psychological mechanisms in preparation for childbirth. American Psychologist, 39, 1357-1371.
Jennifer Gray, MA, is a Ph.D. Graduate Student, Claremont Graduate University.
Correspondence through: Psychology Department, Westmont College, 955 La Paz Road, Santa Barbara, California email@example.com
JOURNAL OF PRENATAL AND PERINATAL PSYCHOLOGY AND HEALTH publishes research and clinical articles from the cutting edge of the science of prenatal and perinatal psychology and health. The journal, published quarterly since 1986, is dedicated to the in-depth exploration human reproduction and pregnancy and the mental and emotional development of the unborn and newborn child.